Viral Videos, Fame, and Hot Air

by Gabriel Okolski on October 20, 2009 · View Comments

Post image for Viral Videos, Fame, and Hot Air

I have a bet going with my fiancee that the Heene family, which were behind last week’s absurd balloon incident that is now believed by authorities to have been staged, will in fact achieve their goal and get their own reality show. In the end, this Kafkaesque ordeal involving a UFO-hunting family with an out-of-this-world father is just too golden for the networks to pass up. Aside from my vested interest in having the Heene family achieve fame, I am more interested in how increased competition for fame on the Internet may have led to such an extreme act.

Creative types have largely embraced outgrowths of Web 2.0 such as YouTube, flickr, Twitter, and blog sites that allow them to easily and cheaply reach a broad audience. But as access to a potential audience grows, so does competition for the attention of the masses. While more people now have a crack at getting fame, earning it is not as simple as posting a home-made rap video you shot on a rainy day last weekend.

The Heene family, which appeared twice on the television program “Wife Swap” and have not hidden their desire for fame, seems to have realized this. Despite a slew of YouTube videos posted by its patriarch, the family never achieved widespread acclaim. It appears as if the Heene clan took more drastic measures to gain attention, wasting an generous amount of public and private resources.

If earning notoriety has implicitly become more costly, such that fame-hungry people are willing to risk incarceration and high fines with their stunts (a similar episode occurred in 2007 when Boston residents mistook neon signs advertising a film for terrorist devices), policymakers may need to devise new incentives to keep competition for attention from imposing external costs. For example, rather than throwing traditional penalties at the Heene parents, authorities could bar the couple from appearing in network television programs.

Aside from leading to more drastic actions to achieve fame, information sharing technologies may also be expected to improve the quality of vehicles to fame due to increased competition. A cheap prank by an eccentric family may call that assertion into question, however. In his book, “What Price Fame?,” Tyler Cowen explains that greater visibility can often lower quality; he gives the example of the rise of flashy moves such as slam dunking in basketball have replaced sound fundamentals in the game. As such, increased visibility through Web technologies may indeed mean that there will be plenty of Heene families for years to come.

Share Print Email This Post Email This Post

  • Gabriel_Okolski
    I agree with you, Jerry, that the Internet has broken down barriers and allows people to achieve a certain level of fame (both of which, I think, provide net benefits to society). However, there are still going to be certain people who seek to achieve a different level of notoriety, and I still believe that the increased ease of gaining attention will force these people to take more drastic measures.

    As an analogy: digital camera technology has become incredibly more sophisticated and allows the masses to take photos of which experts in past years would be envious. But the person aspiring to be a great photographer nowadays has to do something truly spectacular or sensational.
  • Gabe- Putting on my tele-analysis helmet, I think what we have in the balloon boy case is a father who is a little unstable and definitely an outlier. Rather than make people become more and more desperate in their quest for fame, I think the Internet allows people to achieve a certain level of fame that satiates the desires of most.

    Because the Internet destroys the barriers to entry that once prevented a person from being on TV or having a newspaper column, more people can be reach a wide audience--even if it's of a couple thousand rather than millions. And that audience is probably intensely interested in the 'narrowcaster's' subject matter. I couldn't tell you the first thing about Kanye West or Kate Gosslin, but I can tell you plenty about Merlin Mann, Leo Laporte, Jonathan Laroquette, and Seth Romatelli.
  • Except the Boston case was an accident. There's no way they could have expected the Boston police to be dumb enough to arrest them.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: